On 05.09.2018 15:53, Cy Schubert wrote: >> 1601 is not the actual frequency. That is just how it is reported. It >> is almost certainly running much higher than 1601. > > We don't know this until we can independently verify it. Do you mind > running some benchmarks with and without turbo mode? What could be adequate benchmarks for this? Something likje "openssl speed aes128-cbc" or I need more specific one? -- // Lev SerebryakovReceived on Wed Sep 05 2018 - 11:45:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:18 UTC