On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 03:02:29AM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello Benjamin, > > Thursday, September 6, 2018, 1:32:46 AM, you wrote: > > >> > I don't think you need something accurate. > >> Ok, here is results. I'm working in single-user mode. > >> > >> TL;DR "Turbo" mode make "openssl" much slower (x3.5)! > >> > >> I can not properly interpret this result. > > > You need to say more about what openssl is doing (i.e., how it was > > configured, what architecture it's on, etc.). In particular, there > > was for a time an AVX2 implementation for some primitives, that ended up > > being a net loss, since heavy use of those instructions would cause > > overheating and throttling. OpenSSL has a lot of custom assembly for these > > common primitves, with some logic to select among them both at > > configuration time and at runtime, so results such as this may or may not > > be widely transferrable. > > It is system (very fresh ALPHA4) openssl, built with default settings. > Simple single run with one thread, without AES-NI: > > openssl speed aes-256-cbc > > It is as simple as that. Okay, "system openssl" and the FreeBSD version is enough to nail down the code and configuration, and I see the processor type is in the subject line. I guess posting the CPU features bits from dmesg might save whoever tries to track down the codepaths being used some time (unless that was posted already and I missed it?). -BenReceived on Wed Sep 05 2018 - 23:20:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:18 UTC