Re: intr_machdep.c:176:2: error: use of undeclared identifier 'interrupt_sorted'

From: John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:20:11 -0700
On 9/8/18 1:44 PM, Michael Butler wrote:
> On 9/8/18 3:43 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 02:07:41PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
>>> On 8/31/18 1:28 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 12:21:02AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
>>>
>>>  [ .. snip .. ]
>>>
>>>>> I see another problem after using Ian's workaround of moving the #ifdef
>>>>> SMP; it seems I now run out of kernel stack on an i386 (Pentium-III)
>>>>> machine with only 512MB of RAM:
>>>>>
>>>>> Aug 29 23:29:19 sarah kernel: vm_thread_new: kstack allocation failed
>>>>> Aug 29 23:29:26 sarah kernel: vm_thread_new: kstack allocation failed
>>>>> Aug 29 23:29:30 sarah kernel: vm_thread_new: kstack allocation failed
>>>>> Aug 29 23:29:38 sarah kernel: vm_thread_new: kstack allocation failed
>>>>> Aug 29 23:29:38 sarah kernel: vm_thread_new: kstack allocation failed
>>>>> Aug 29 23:29:40 sarah kernel: vm_thread_new: kstack allocation failed
>>>>
>>>> What is the kernel revision for "now".  What was the previous revision
>>>> where the kstack allocation failures did not happen.
>>>>
>>>> Also, what is the workload ?
>>>
>>> Sorry for the delay. Any version at or after SVN r338360 would either a)
>>> not boot at all or b) crash shortly after boot with a swarm of messages
>>> as above. It was stable before that.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, this machine is remote and, being as old as it is, has no
>>> remote console facility. 'nextboot' has been my savior ;-)
>>>
>>> It is a 700MHz Pentium-III with 512MB of RAM and has 3 used interfaces,
>>> local ethernet (FXP), GIF for an IPv6 tunnel to HE and TAP for an
>>> OpenVPN endpoint. It has IPFW compiled into the kernel and acts as a
>>> router/firewall with few actual applications running.
>>>
>>> As another data point, I manually reversed both SVN r338360 and r338415
>>> (a related change) and it is now stable running at SVN r338520,
>>
>> It is very unprobable.  I do not see how could r338360 affect KVA allocation.
>> Double-check that you booted right kernels.
>>
> 
> FreeBSD sarah.protected-networks.net 12.0-ALPHA5 FreeBSD 12.0-ALPHA5 #14
> r338520M: Thu Sep  6 21:35:31 EDT 2018
> 
> 'svn diff' reports the only changes being the two reversals I noted above,

Can you get the output of 'x num_io_irqs' at the DDB prompt after the
panic?
-- 
John Baldwin

                                                                            
Received on Mon Sep 10 2018 - 15:20:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:18 UTC