I say yes, especially if we wish to support a IPv6 only system at some point in the future … which seemed to be a “think” of the few major IPv6 advocates in the industry. I guess best practice, this should suck in rc.* config files, and use v6 if v6 is set via one of the ipv6_* variables. -- David P. Discher https://davidpdischer.com/ dpd_at_dpdtech.com > On Sep 23, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Sean Bruno <sbruno_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > Does it make sense to add an IPv6 localhost (::1) to our setup scripts > for local_unbound? unbound is definitely listening on ::1 as well at > 127.0.0.1 so things like "host -6" will work if we add it like this perhaps? > > --- /usr/sbin/local-unbound-setup 2018-09-20 21:47:41.000000000 -0600 > +++ /tmp/local-unbound-setup 2018-09-23 13:27:01.841365000 -0600 > _at__at_ -152,6 +152,7 _at__at_ > done > if [ "${localhost}" = "no" ] ; then > echo "nameserver 127.0.0.1" > + echo "nameserver ::1" > fi > if [ "${edns0}" = "no" ] ; then > echo "options edns0" >Received on Sun Sep 23 2018 - 20:10:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:18 UTC