On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 08:57:13AM +0300, nonameless_at_ukr.net wrote: > I see the same thing with base /usr/bin/ld and /usr/local/bin/ld from binutils. Yes but a direct ld use is very rare. When it is needed, usually the level of hackery applied is already high enough for the user to already know what she does. I did not see it causing issues practically, while multiple clangs in the path cause real problems. > > --- Original message --- > From: "Konstantin Belousov" <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> > Date: 15 August 2019, 19:48:37 > > Please look at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21060 > I propose to stop installing /usr/bin/clang, clang++, clang-cpp. > > It probably does not matter when all your software comes from ports or > packages, but is actually very annoying when developing on FreeBSD. > In particular, you never know which `clang' is called in the user > environment, because it depends on the $PATH elements ordering. > > To clear some confusion: this has nothing to do with not installing > compiler from base, /usr/bin/c{c,++,pp} are still there after the change > is applied. It only to make clang on par with gcc, and to remove one > thing that was quite time-consuming in multi-target environment for me > during porting something large in FreeBSD userspace. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Fri Aug 16 2019 - 06:17:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:21 UTC