Hello, On my Ryzen the sha256 command is much slower than openssl dgst -sha256. For large files, openssl is more than 7 times faster in practice. You can also test it with the builtin benchmarks: sha256 -t openssl speed sha256 I think the reason is that openssl supports the SHA CPU extensions whereas libmd (used by sha256) does not. Any chance we can make the base sha256 faster? I guess there is some reason why we use libmd instead of openssl. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2651 looks related but not sure it's still relevant.Received on Sun Jan 06 2019 - 23:18:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:19 UTC