Re: [package - head-i386-default][sysutils/lsof] Failed for lsof-4.93.2_2,8 in build

From: Larry Rosenman <ler_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:10:46 -0500
On 07/25/2019 1:40 pm, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:35:32 -0600
> Alan Somers <asomers_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:13 PM Larry Rosenman <ler_at_freebsd.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 07/25/2019 1:10 pm, Alan Somers wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:05 PM Larry Rosenman <ler_at_freebsd.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> Um....  Who broke this?
> ...
>> > > "svn blame" suggests r350199 by kib.  However, refcount.h should
>> > > only be included if lsof defines _KERNEL, which normal programs
>> > > shouldn't. So I think this should be considered a bug in lsof.
>> > > -Alan
>> >
>> >
>> > we *HAVE* to define _KERNEL, to get at the kernel structures.....
>> 
>> Then I think you have to live with this amount of instability.
>> refcount(9) says that you should include <sys/param.h>.  Did you do
>> that?  If so, then this is a man page bug and refcount(9) should also
>> specify stdbool.h.
>> -Alan
> 
> <sys/param.h> includes <sys/types.h> already, which typedefs bool.  So
> <sys/param.h> should suffice to include in lsof.
> 
> - Justin
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"

Thanks all!  I've got a PR into the lsof repo, and I'll fix it there.

If we can't get a release out in the next day or 2, I'll patch it in the 
port.

https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/pull/70
-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://people.freebsd.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640                 E-Mail: ler_at_FreeBSD.org
US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Dr, Round Rock, TX 78665-2106
Received on Thu Jul 25 2019 - 17:10:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:21 UTC