Re: One True Awk upgrade

From: Warner Losh <>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 15:37:16 -0600
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 10:55 AM Warner Losh <> wrote:

> I'm upgrading the in-tree version of one-true-awk. Normally, this isn't a
> problem, but there's a number of small differences I'm still trying
> to figure out due to our... contorted history. Some of the revisions we had
> in the vendor branch of our repo were accepted as-is, some completely, and
> some not yet, We've also added bug fixes we've found, as well as fixes from
> other BSDs, which has also caused at least one unexplained difference.
> I should have it sorted out in the next day or so, but wanted to give a
> heads up. I doubt anybody would notice, but each of the differences is
> going to take a little time to sort out, chase back to the failing case,
> work out with upstream if there's a bug or not, etc. There's also a small
> window between r348513 and r348515 where the tree fails to build (due to
> svn's commit subtree vs git's commit while tree differences).
> Also, I've not tagged this as such, but my plans are to MFC to 12 next
> week, and to 11 after 11.3R goes out the door.

OK. I've resolved all the diffs between the git-tree I had and what made it
into the tree. the upgrade is now complete, and I've pushed my notion of
what awk should be to the bsd-ota branch in I'll work on folding them into upstream,
although some of them are quite old and I'm unsure if they are appropriate
for upstream...

Received on Sun Jun 02 2019 - 19:37:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:20 UTC