On 2019-10-17 23:05, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:31:12PM +0200, Niclas Zeising wrote: >> On 2019-10-17 21:53, markj_at_freebsd.org wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:03:51PM +0200, Niclas Zeising wrote: >>>> On 2019-10-16 18:57, Neel Chauhan wrote: >>>>> While drm-current-kmod worked for a little while, it broke with r353645. >>>>> >>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Q5nYZf2.jpg >>>>> >>>>> I'm using the same HP Spectre that I used earlier (where it worked and >>>>> where it panicked). >>>>> >>>> >>>> That commit looks unrelated, it touches the wbwd and superio drivers, >>>> nothing else. Any chance you can bisect exactly which revision that >>>> caused the new issues? >>> >>> I believe it was the recent work on the vm page busy state, r353539 >>> specifically. This patch should fix it; we don't yet have a >>> __FreeBSD_version number bump on which to gate the patch. >>> >>> diff --git a/linuxkpi/gplv2/src/linux_page.c b/linuxkpi/gplv2/src/linux_page.c >>> index e2b85c45c..060ae85ed 100644 >>> --- a/linuxkpi/gplv2/src/linux_page.c >>> +++ b/linuxkpi/gplv2/src/linux_page.c >>> _at__at_ -239,7 +239,7 _at__at_ retry: >>> page = vm_page_lookup(devobj, i); >>> if (page == NULL) >>> continue; >>> - if (vm_page_sleep_if_busy(page, "linuxkpi")) >>> + if (!vm_page_busy_acquire(page, VM_ALLOC_WAITFAIL)) >>> goto retry; >>> cdev_pager_free_page(devobj, page); >>> } >> >> Hi! >> Hopefully someone can confirm that this patch to drm-current-kmod or >> drm-devel-kmod fixes the issue. I won't be able to work on this before >> the weekend at the earliest, I'm afraid. >> Mark, is it possible to get a belated version bump for this fix, and >> what changed to require it? > > I committed the bump and verified the patch on amdgpu. Here are some > PRs for the drivers: > > https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/kms-drm/pull/180 > https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/kms-drm/pull/181 Hi! I'm working on getting this into the versions that are in ports. For drm-current-kmod it's fairly simple, but for drm-devel-kmod there are unrelated changes which I need to check if they are ready to go in or not, so it will take some more time. Looking at the mail list thread, there seems to be a patch needed for base as well, has this been committed? Regards -- NiclasReceived on Mon Oct 21 2019 - 06:14:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:22 UTC