On Sat, 2019-09-14 at 11:05 -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: > After updating my amd64 context to head -r352274, > attempting an amd64->armv7 cross buildworld buildkernel > ended up failing with: > > > --- am335x_dmtpps.o --- > /usr/src/sys/arm/ti/am335x/am335x_dmtpps.c:304:3: error: implicit > declaration of function 'spinlock_enter' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,- > Wimplicit-function-declaration] > mtx_lock_spin(&sc->pps_mtx); > ^ > /usr/src/sys/sys/mutex.h:383:26: note: expanded from macro > 'mtx_lock_spin' > #define mtx_lock_spin(m) mtx_lock_spin_flags((m), 0) > ^ > /usr/src/sys/sys/mutex.h:452:2: note: expanded from macro > 'mtx_lock_spin_flags' > mtx_lock_spin_flags_((m), (opts), LOCK_FILE, LOCK_LINE) > ^ > /usr/src/sys/sys/mutex.h:429:2: note: expanded from macro > 'mtx_lock_spin_flags_' > __mtx_lock_spin((m), curthread, (opts), (file), (line)) > ^ > /usr/src/sys/sys/mutex.h:258:2: note: expanded from macro > '__mtx_lock_spin' > spinlock_enter(); > \ > ^ > /usr/src/sys/arm/ti/am335x/am335x_dmtpps.c:304:3: error: this > function declaration is not a prototype [-Werror,-Wstrict-prototypes] > /usr/src/sys/sys/mutex.h:383:26: note: expanded from macro > 'mtx_lock_spin' > #define mtx_lock_spin(m) mtx_lock_spin_flags((m), 0) > ^ > /usr/src/sys/sys/mutex.h:452:2: note: expanded from macro > 'mtx_lock_spin_flags' > mtx_lock_spin_flags_((m), (opts), LOCK_FILE, LOCK_LINE) > ^ > /usr/src/sys/sys/mutex.h:429:2: note: expanded from macro > 'mtx_lock_spin_flags_' > __mtx_lock_spin((m), curthread, (opts), (file), (line)) > ^ > /usr/src/sys/sys/mutex.h:258:2: note: expanded from macro > '__mtx_lock_spin' > spinlock_enter(); > \ > ^ > . . . > > (spinlock_enter was not the only example.) > > My bad, I forgot to include <lock.h> when I switched the code to spinlocks. Should be fixed by r352333. -- IanReceived on Sat Sep 14 2019 - 16:21:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:21 UTC