On Tue, 4 Aug 2020 at 02:25, Matthew Macy <mmacy_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing for the > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs. We'd like to give users roughly a > month to test before merging. The tentative merge date is August > 17th. > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out that > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to avoid any > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees following > the merge. > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs/latest/ > > If you're using a platform not listed above and would be inclined to > test if you had an image to work with, let us know. Alternatively, you > can still build following the instructions below. > > The review for merging in to base can be found at: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25872 > > ========================================================== > NB: Do NOT zpool upgrade unless you are willing to live without the > ability to ever rollback to the legacy zfs kmod. > > Checkout updated HEAD: > % git clone https://github.com/mattmacy/networking.git -b > projects/openzfs_vendor freebsd > > Checkout updated openzfs in to sys/contrib: > % git clone https://github.com/zfsonfreebsd/ZoF.git -b > projects/openzfs_vendor freebsd/sys/contrib/openzfs > > Build world and kernel with whatever your usual configuration is. > Where possible the openzfs kmod is backward compatible with the cmd > utils in HEAD so common operations work with existing tools and the > new kmod. In the projects/openzfs_vendor branch of ZoF ozfs libraries > are backward compatible with the zfs kmod in HEAD. Although ideally > one would test this in a separate boot environment, the > interoperability should allow one to rollback without too much > difficulty. > > NB: The patch updates /etc/rc.d/zfs - so if you skip mergemaster pools > other than the root pool will not be imported at boot. > > Thanks in advance for your time. > > -M > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" Hi. I have some problems downloading the amd64 image: baymax /home/djn > fetch -a https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs/latest/freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img. 19% of 655 MB 2179 kBps 04m07s fetch: freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz appears to be truncated: 134152192/687158140 bytes baymax /home/djn > fetch -ar https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs/latest/freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img. 20% of 655 MB 882 kBps 09m10s fetch: freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz appears to be truncated: 139132928/687158140 bytes baymax /home/djn > fetch -ar https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs/latest/freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img. 20% of 655 MB 647 kBps 12m23s fetch: freebsd-openzfs-amd64-2020081100-memstick.img.xz appears to be truncated: 142065664/687158140 bytes baymax /home/djn > It also fails using Firefox on windows on a different machine. (It's also much slower from that machine, about 200 kB/sec. I have no idea if that's relevant.) -- Daniel NebdalReceived on Sat Aug 15 2020 - 16:35:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:24 UTC