On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 10:10:14PM +0000, you (marco) sent the following to [freebsd-current] : > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 04:48:48PM +0000, you (marco) sent the following to [freebsd-current] : > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:31:24PM -0400, you (Ryan Moeller) sent the following to [freebsd-current] : > > > > > So besides not being able to boot from the openzfs 2020080800 package install, I can't figure out why I can't upgrade the openzfs pkg to 2020081800 (which is the latest one in ports so I presume a package also exists of that same version) > > > > If that won't work either I'll see if I can build sysutils/openzfs from ports but I'd rather not mix packages and ports. > > building and installing the GENERIC kernel did not do anything. > I can confirm BE r364030-OpenZFS booted with GENERIC but I got dropped > into the mountroot prompt again. > Before I got there I saw: > > Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot/ROOT/r364030-OpenZFS failed with > error 2: unknown file system. > > Guess I'll try to install sysutils/openzfs from ports next. Not happy with having to install the port but that worked. I removed openzfs and openzfs-kmod via pkg remove. Then did a 'make install clean' from sysutils/openzfs (2020081800) with r364030 BE active. Once I confirmed the port installed a newer /boot/modules/openzfs.ko I destroyed r364030-OpenZFS and created it again so it would be in sync with r364030 and it would have the latest openzfs.ko. When I imported my backup pool (single drive, 1 vdev) /etc/zfs/zpool.cache was automatically created. So now I have 2 zpool cache files [~] ls -l /boot/zfs/zpool.cache /etc/zfs/zpool.cache -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1456 Aug 22 22:04 /boot/zfs/zpool.cache -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3088 Aug 22 22:54 /etc/zfs/zpool.cache [~] zpool get cachefile zroot backup NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE backup cachefile - default zroot cachefile - default So the port does work even with running the GENERIC-NODEBUG kernel. Is it even possible to build a port only into a new BE and not the current one given how /usr is not mounted? Now I had to polute the active BE which could get me into trouble. I was hoping using BEs I could experiment by installing a port straight into the mounted BE. If that is possible I wouldn't mind getting some pointers on how to make that work. -- Marco van Lienen -- FreeBSD enthusiast https://keybase.io/scarcry , GnuPG id: 8580E6CB "The Tuck Pendleton machine...zero defects."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:24 UTC