On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 3:20 PM Kristof Provost <kp_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > On 31 Dec 2020, at 23:09, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > Its for ever dead code on a large number of machines that do not have > > the hardware for it. I know that is a decreasing set, but imho it > > would be better to somehow ONLY load the module if you had CPU > > support for it. The down side is that detection would probably have > > to be in the laoder as this code can be used very early on. > > > According to kldstat it uses all of 42KB of memory. > > 16 1 0xffffffff83313000 a290 aesni.ko > > That’s such a trivial amount of memory it’s not even worth > mentioning. Even in tiny embedded systems (and who runs tiny embedded > systems on x86?) it’s utterly insignificant. > > Even if it were significant, how many of the systems without the > relevant hardware are ever going to run 13? > > Regards, > Kristof > And tiny embedded systems are probably running custom kernels anyway, so they can remove it. I'm sold. Let's put it in GENERIC. -AlanReceived on Thu Dec 31 2020 - 21:24:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:26 UTC