On 2020-01-31 13:31, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:13:58AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >> On 2020-01-31 00:37, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 11:23:02PM +0000, Rick Macklem wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The current code for KERN_TLS uses PHYS_TO_DMAP() >>>> to access unmapped external pages on m_ext.ext_pgs >>>> mbufs. >>>> I also need to do this to implement RPC-over-TLS. >>>> >>>> The problem is that some arches, like i386, don't >>>> support PHYS_TO_DMAP(). >>>> >>>> Since it appears that there will be at most 4 pages on >>>> one of these mbufs, my thinking was... >>>> - Acquire four pages of kva from the kernel_map during >>>> booting. >>>> - Then just use pmap_qenter() to fill in the physical page >>>> mappings for long enough to copy the data. >>>> >>>> Does this sound reasonable? >>>> Is there a better way? >>> >>> Use sfbufs, they should work on all arches. In essence, they provide MI >>> interface to DMAP where possible. I do not remember did I bumped the >>> limit for i386 after 4/4 went in. >>> >>> There is currently no limits for sfbufs use per subsystem, but I think it >>> is not very likely to cause too much troubles. Main rule is to not sleep >>> waiting for more sfbufs if you already own one.. >> >> In the DRM-KMS LinuxKPI we have: >> >> void * >> kmap(vm_page_t page) >> { >> #ifdef LINUXKPI_HAVE_DMAP >> vm_offset_t daddr; >> >> daddr = PHYS_TO_DMAP(VM_PAGE_TO_PHYS(page)); >> >> return ((void *)daddr); >> #else >> struct sf_buf *sf; >> >> sched_pin(); >> sf = sf_buf_alloc(page, SFB_NOWAIT | SFB_CPUPRIVATE); >> if (sf == NULL) { >> sched_unpin(); >> return (NULL); >> } >> return ((void *)sf_buf_kva(sf)); >> #endif >> } >> >> void >> kunmap(vm_page_t page) >> { >> #ifdef LINUXKPI_HAVE_DMAP >> /* NOP */ >> #else >> struct sf_buf *sf; >> >> /* lookup SF buffer in list */ >> sf = sf_buf_alloc(page, SFB_NOWAIT | SFB_CPUPRIVATE); >> >> /* double-free */ >> sf_buf_free(sf); >> sf_buf_free(sf); >> >> sched_unpin(); >> #endif >> } >> >> I think that is the fastest way to do this. > > So the kmap address is only valid on the CPU that called the function ? > This is strange, I was not able to find mention of it in references to > kmap. Yes, only on the current CPU. See the SFB_CPUPRIVATE flag. --HPSReceived on Sat Feb 01 2020 - 11:57:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:23 UTC