John Baldwin wrote: >On 1/7/20 3:02 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Now that I've completed NFSv4.2 I'm on to the next project, which is making NFS >> work over TLS. >> Of course, I know absolutely nothing about TLS, which will make this an interesting >> exercise for me. >> I did find simple server code in the OpenSSL doc. which at least gives me a starting >> point for the initialization stuff. >> As I understand it, this initialization must be done in userspace? >> >> Then somehow, the ktls takes over and does the encryption of the >> data being sent on the socket via sosend_generic(). Does that sound right? >> >> So, how does the kernel know the stuff that the initialization phase (handshake) >> figures out, or is it magic I don't have to worry about? >> >> Don't waste much time replying to this. A few quick hints will keep me going for >> now. (From what I've seen sofar, this TLS stuff isn't simple. And I thought Kerberos >> was a pain.;-) >> >> Thanks in advance for any hints, rick > >Hmmm, this might be a fair bit of work indeed. If it was easy, it wouldn't be fun;-) FreeBSD13 is a ways off and if it doesn't make that, oh well.. >Right now KTLS only works for transmit (though I have some WIP for receive). Hopefully your WIP will make progress someday, or I might be able to work on it. >KTLS does assumes that the initial handshake and key negotiation is handled by >OpenSSL. OpenSSL uses custom setockopt() calls to tell the kernel which >session keys to use. Yea, I figured I'd need a daemon like the gssd for this. The krpc makes it a little more fun, since it handles TCP connections in the kernel. >I think what you would want to do is use something like OpenSSL_connect() in >userspace, and then check to see if KTLS "worked". Thanks (and for the code below). I found the simple server code in the OpenSSL doc, but the client code gets a web page and is quite involved. >If it did, you can tell >the kernel it can write to the socket directly, otherwise you will have to >bounce data back out to userspace to run it through SSL_write() and have >userspace do SSL_read() and then feed data into the kernel. I don't think bouncing the data up/down to/from userland would work well. I'd say "if it can't be done in the kernel, too bad". The above could be used for a NULL RPC to see it is working, for the client. >The pseudo-code might look something like: > >SSL *s; > >s = SSL_new(...); > >/* fd is the existing TCP socket */ >SSL_set_fd(s, fd); >OpenSSL_connect(s); >if (BIO_get_ktls_send(SSL_get_wbio(s)) { > /* Can use KTLS for transmit. */ >} >if (BIO_get_ktls_recv(SSL_get_rbio(s)) { > /* Can use KTLS for receive. */ >} Thanks John, rick -- John BaldwinReceived on Thu Jan 09 2020 - 21:53:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:22 UTC