On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:18:41AM +0000, Clay Daniels wrote: > 13.0-CURRENT r356767 would not take NO for an answer, and kept up a loop > until I gave up trying to use UFS. No big deal, seems to work fine... > > Clay > .... Err...? Is there some additional context that I'm missing? I've been tracking head daily for ... longer than I really want to think about, including on at least one system that has no ZFS file systems; the last couple of smoke-tests were at: FreeBSD g1-53.catwhisker.org 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #7 r356758M/356758: Wed Jan 15 03:49:49 PST 2020 root_at_g1-53.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY amd64 1300076 1300076 and FreeBSD g1-53.catwhisker.org 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #8 r356786M/356787: Thu Jan 16 03:56:45 PST 2020 root_at_g1-53.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY amd64 1300076 1300076 It is not clear to me at what point anything might have a chance to indicate that it "wanted ZFS" and request an action. Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david_at_catwhisker.org At least Trump can count on McConnell and Putin to "have his back." And the rest of us can consider what that means about each of them. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:22 UTC