[Just a correction to a side comment.] On 2020-Jul-13, at 12:46, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote: > On 2020-Jul-13, at 12:03, John-Mark Gurney <jmg at funkthat.com> wrote: > >> Mark Millard wrote this message on Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 00:44 -0700: >>> On 2020-Jul-12, at 21:51, John-Mark Gurney <jmg at funkthat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> . . . >>> >>> Hmm. I only seem to be able to find one type. Its been a >>> while since I've used the other and I do not know where >>> it is at. For what I found: >>> >>> ugen0.2: <ASIX Elec. AX88179> at usbus0 >>> axge0 on uhub0 >>> axge0: <NetworkInterface> on usbus0 >>> miibus1: <MII bus> on axge0 >>> rgephy0: <RTL8169S/8110S/8211 1000BASE-T media interface> PHY 3 on miibus1 >>> rgephy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 10baseT-FDX-flow, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 100baseTX-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, 1000baseT-FDX-flow, 1000baseT-FDX-flow-master, auto, auto-flow >>> >>> (I have access to more than one instance of the above.) >> >> Yeah, these are the ones that are known to not be able to get close >> to gige speeds, unlike the RealTek one that I am using now... > > Hmm, in one direction anyway? > > NetBSD current testing on a RPi4 for > iperf3 -R -c 192.168.1.120 -B 192.168.1.140 : > > Server listening on 5201 > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Accepted connection from 192.168.1.140, port 65525 > [ 5] local 192.168.1.120 port 5201 connected to 192.168.1.140 port 65524 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 33.7 MBytes 282 Mbits/sec 0 33.9 KBytes > [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 96.0 MBytes 805 Mbits/sec 2 48.9 KBytes > [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 111 MBytes 930 Mbits/sec 12 81.9 KBytes > [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 83.8 MBytes 703 Mbits/sec 18 114 KBytes > [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 83.7 MBytes 702 Mbits/sec 42 145 KBytes > [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 84.8 MBytes 712 Mbits/sec 50 178 KBytes > [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 111 MBytes 929 Mbits/sec 40 194 KBytes > [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 83.6 MBytes 701 Mbits/sec 40 194 KBytes > [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 111 MBytes 930 Mbits/sec 47 194 KBytes > [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 111 MBytes 927 Mbits/sec 50 193 KBytes > [ 5] 10.00-10.62 sec 68.4 MBytes 929 Mbits/sec 46 193 KBytes > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr > [ 5] 0.00-10.62 sec 977 MBytes 772 Mbits/sec 347 sender > > and as seen on the receiver: > > # iperf3 -R -c 192.168.1.120 -B 192.168.1.140 > Connecting to host 192.168.1.120, port 5201 > Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.1.120 is sending > [ 5] local 192.168.1.140 port 65524 connected to 192.168.1.120 port 5201 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 87.8 MBytes 736 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 110 MBytes 924 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 83.7 MBytes 702 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 83.6 MBytes 701 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 84.8 MBytes 711 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 111 MBytes 931 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 83.4 MBytes 700 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 111 MBytes 930 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 111 MBytes 929 Mbits/sec > [ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 111 MBytes 929 Mbits/sec > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr > [ 5] 0.00-10.62 sec 977 MBytes 772 Mbits/sec 347 sender > [ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 977 MBytes 819 Mbits/sec receiver > > This is faster than the built-in EtherNet results. > (But the built-in is also USB based.) The built-in EtherNet does not show in usbdevs output. I got the context wrong for the ()'d note. > As for iperf3 -c 192.168.1.120 -B 192.168.1.140 it is > slower: > > Connecting to host 192.168.1.120, port 5201 > [ 5] local 192.168.1.140 port 65526 connected to 192.168.1.120 port 5201 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd > [ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 62.5 MBytes 522 Mbits/sec 0 4.00 MBytes > [ 5] 1.00-2.01 sec 62.5 MBytes 524 Mbits/sec 0 4.00 MBytes > [ 5] 2.01-3.01 sec 62.5 MBytes 524 Mbits/sec 0 4.00 MBytes > [ 5] 3.01-4.01 sec 62.5 MBytes 524 Mbits/sec 0 4.00 MBytes > [ 5] 4.01-5.01 sec 62.5 MBytes 525 Mbits/sec 0 4.00 MBytes > [ 5] 5.01-6.01 sec 62.5 MBytes 523 Mbits/sec 0 4.00 MBytes > [ 5] 6.01-7.01 sec 62.5 MBytes 525 Mbits/sec 0 4.00 MBytes > [ 5] 7.01-8.01 sec 62.5 MBytes 525 Mbits/sec 0 4.00 MBytes > [ 5] 8.01-9.01 sec 62.5 MBytes 524 Mbits/sec 0 4.00 MBytes > [ 5] 9.01-10.01 sec 62.5 MBytes 525 Mbits/sec 0 4.00 MBytes > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr > [ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 625 MBytes 524 Mbits/sec 0 sender > [ 5] 0.00-10.62 sec 625 MBytes 494 Mbits/sec receiver > > This is again faster than the built-in EtherNet results. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)Received on Mon Jul 13 2020 - 18:18:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:24 UTC