On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:50:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy_at_freebsd.org said > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 20:43 Chris <bsd-lists_at_bsdforge.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:08:33 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy_at_freebsd.org said > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 8:03 PM Chris <bsd-lists_at_bsdforge.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:10:21 -0700 Matthew Macy mmacy_at_freebsd.org said > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 8th I issued the initial call for testing for the > > > > > update to HEAD to vendored openzfs. We'd like to give users roughly a > > > > > month to test before merging. The tentative merge date is August > > > > > 17th. > > > > > > > > > > Again, I hope it's not terribly controversial to point out that > > > > > it really rests with users of non amd64 platforms to test to avoid > > any > > > > > unpleasant surprises the next time they update their trees following > > > > > the merge. > > > > > > > > > > amd64, i386, and aarch64 memdisk images can be found at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://people.freebsd.org/~freqlabs/freebsd-openzfs-3d833bea-f10f94aa-2020072900/ > > > > > > > > Is this in an attempt to replace the opensolaris version used now? > > > > > > The word "attempt" is a misnomer. If you search the mail archives this > > > has been the PoR for some time. > > Sure. OK. I caught this thread. But must have missed the announcement > > of the intent to replace the opensolaris version with openzfs. > > Do you recall which mailing list that was made to? > > > > Thank you for your quick reply, Matthew. > > > > Apart from the 3 previous CFT mails, the initial intent was discussed in > December 2018. Getting FreeBSD support integrated in to openzfs took a lot > more incremental PRs than I anticipated. > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2018-December/072422.html Thank you very much, Mathew. Sorry for any bother. --Chris > > Cheers. > >Received on Wed Jul 29 2020 - 02:06:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:24 UTC