On 3/29/20 6:11 AM, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > 3. based solution looks good to me. > > IMHO, assuming /efi/bootx[64|32].efi is boot1.efi or loader.efi > or EFI environment pointing to either one is properly used, That's another thing: we should be installing loader.efi as \efi\boot\bootx64.efi (as well as \boot\freebsd\loader.efi) since it's entirely possible to lose the Boot Manager entry and end up with an unbootable system as a result. Unfortunately people have had bad experiences with other operating systems overwriting bootx64.efi and don't believe we should do that. Perhaps I just need to come up with a proof of concept or demo to show that it is possible without breaking other OSes. -- Rebecca CranReceived on Sun Mar 29 2020 - 21:18:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:23 UTC