On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 9:23 PM Rebecca Cran <rebecca_at_bsdio.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 29, 2020, at 9:11 PM, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn_at_freebsd.org> > wrote: > > > > The problem then is that we have treated loader as a > > continuously-updatable part of the OS, like the kernel, and the update > > system and development process assumes they get updated in sync. > > But at the moment how often do users mount the ESP and update loader.efi > on it? So it seems it rarely _needs_ to be updated at the moment. > True, but as we move from boot1.efi to loader.efi, the need will grow... Even if we keep boot1.efi, loader.efi will be needed for interesting secure systems, so we can't cop-out like we have in the past. WarnerReceived on Mon Mar 30 2020 - 01:26:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:23 UTC