Quoting Kristof Provost <kp_at_freebsd.org> (from Sat, 03 Oct 2020 16:06:43 +0200): > Okay, let’s abandon that patch. It’s ugly and it doesn’t work. > > Here’s a different approach that I’m much happier with. > https://people.freebsd.org/~kp/0001-bridge-Call-member-interface-ioctl-without-NET_EPOCH.patch > > It passes the regression tests with WITNESS and INVARIANTS enabled, > and a hack in the epair ioctl() handler to make it sleep (to look a > bit like the Intel ioctl() handler that currently trips up if_bridge). Works for me. No crash, no LOR, promisc-mode stays enabled, jails are reachable. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander_at_Leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild_at_FreeBSD.org : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:25 UTC