On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 03:34:10PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <20201030220809.GG2033_at_zxy.spb.ru>, Slawa Olhovchenkov writes: > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 01:53:10PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > > > In message <20201030204622.GF2033_at_zxy.spb.ru>, Slawa Olhovchenkov writes: > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 08:13:00PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > > > > > > > In message <E1kWvLj-0000GY-Ic.qroxana-mail-ru_at_smtp29.i.mail.ru>, qroxan > > a > > > > > writes > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have an old i386 machine running r364479. After upgrading to > > > > > > r367045, running kldload zfs.ko freezes the whole system. > > > > > > > > > > > > I also tried to replace the 4GB memory with another 2GB one > > > > > > and kldload zfs.ko works without freezing the machine. > > > > > > > > > > ZFS ARC stresses memory. I've found a number of bad RAM chips over the > > > > > years using ZFS. > > > > > > > > > > The OpenZFS upgrade significantly changed how it manages ARC. It's like > > ly > > > > > that prior to the OpenZFS upgrade your memory wasn't stressed to the po > > int > > > > > of failure. You can try to mask the problem by reducing your RAM clock > > rate > > > > > > > > > or or increase one of the other latency settings in your BIOS. However, > > > > > > > again, this only masks an already weak RAM chip. > > > > > > > > Sounds like performance drop and regression > > > > > > How so. Please explain. > > > > More stresses memory usually refers to performance penalty. > > Usually way for better performance is reduce memory access. > > The reason filesystems (UFS, ZFS, EXT4, etc.) cache is to avoid disk > accesses. Nanoseconds vs milliseconds. I mean compared ZoL ZFS ARC vs old (BSD/Opensolaris/Illumos) ZFS ARC. Any reaason to rise ARC hit rate in ZoL case?Received on Fri Oct 30 2020 - 21:47:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:25 UTC