Re: should rpctlssd be called rpc.tlssd?

From: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists_at_klop.ws>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 13:00:33 +0200 (CEST)
 
Van: Rick Macklem <rmacklem_at_uoguelph.ca>
Datum: dinsdag, 1 september 2020 04:37
Aan: "freebsd-current_at_FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-current_at_FreeBSD.org>
Onderwerp: should rpctlssd be called rpc.tlssd?
> 
> This sounds trivial, but I thought I'd ask, in case anyone
> has a preference?
> 
> The NFS over TLS code includes two daemons, one for
> the client and one for the server.
> I have called them rpctlscd and rpctlssd.
> 
> There was/is a tradition in Sun RPC of putting a "." in
> the names.
> So, should I be calling these daemons:
> rpc.tlscd and rpc.tlssd?

I don't have an opinion about the rpc* vs rpc.* tradition.
But what I do not understand is why the difference between 2 daemons is only reflected in 1 character of their names. The rest of the name is actually not really significant in keeping them apart.

Regards and happy hacking,
Ronald.

 > 
> Thanks, rick
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
> 
Received on Tue Sep 01 2020 - 09:00:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:25 UTC