On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:27:08PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:03:36PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:49:13PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 01:59:58PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > > Just a headsup for anyone doing numerical work with > > > > > FreeBSD-current. clang with optimization of -O1 or > > > > > higher produces wrong results. Testing 1 million > > > > > complex values of ccoshf and limiting |z| < 20, > > > > > shows > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is either an in-ling bug or discarding a cast issue. > > > > With everything in the same file so clang has dp_ccosh > > > > available to it when compiling main. > > > > > > > > > > Code builds and works as expected with gcc 10.2and > > > gcc 11.0.0. > > > > > > > Can't find a list of options that is equivalent to -O1, > > so cannot test various optimizations. > > > > Notice that -march=i686 gives the wrong results and > > -march=core2 gives the correct result. Trying -march=i686 > > -msse -msse2 gives the correct result. It seems that > > clang does not understand how the x87 (on i585-freebsd). > > I tried looking around some and got the following > that might be contributing: variations in > __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ used . . . > > # cc -target i386-unknown-freebsd14.0 -march=i686 -O2 -x c /dev/null -dM -E | egrep "(FLT_EVAL_METHOD|ILP32|LP64)" > #define _ILP32 1 > #define __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ 2 > #define __ILP32__ 1 > > # cc -target i386-unknown-freebsd14.0 -march=core2 -O2 -x c /dev/null -dM -E | egrep "(FLT_EVAL_METHOD|ILP32|LP64)" > #define _ILP32 1 > #define __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ 0 > #define __ILP32__ 1 > > # cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd14.0 -march=core2 -O2 -x c /dev/null -dM -E | egrep "(FLT_EVAL_METHOD|ILP32|LP64)" > #define _LP64 1 > #define __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ 0 > #define __LP64__ 1 > > FYI: It does not look like FreeBSD's /usr/include/x86/float.h > matches all the detail: > > #if __ISO_C_VISIBLE >= 1999 > #ifdef __LP64__ > #define FLT_EVAL_METHOD 0 /* no promotions */ > #else > #define FLT_EVAL_METHOD (-1) /* i387 semantics are...interesting */ > #endif > . . . > #endif > > > For reference: > > # cc -target i386-unknown-freebsd14.0 -O2 -x c /dev/null -dM -E | egrep "(FLT_EVAL_METHOD|ILP32|LP64)" > #define _ILP32 1 > #define __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ 2 > #define __ILP32__ 1 > > # cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd14.0 -O2 -x c /dev/null -dM -E | egrep "(FLT_EVAL_METHOD|ILP32|LP64)" > #define _LP64 1 > #define __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ 0 > #define __LP64__ 1 > > # cc -target x86_64-unknown-freebsd14.0 -march=i686 -O2 -x c /dev/null -dM -E | grep FLT_EVAL_METHOD | sort > error: unknown target CPU 'i686' > note: valid target CPU values are: nocona, core2, penryn, bonnell, atom, silvermont, slm, goldmont, goldmont-plus, tremont, nehalem, corei7, westmere, sandybridge, corei7-avx, ivybridge, core-avx-i, haswell, core-avx2, broadwell, skylake, skylake-avx512, skx, cascadelake, cooperlake, cannonlake, icelake-client, icelake-server, tigerlake, knl, knm, k8, athlon64, athlon-fx, opteron, k8-sse3, athlon64-sse3, opteron-sse3, amdfam10, barcelona, btver1, btver2, bdver1, bdver2, bdver3, bdver4, znver1, znver2, x86-64 > > # cc -v > FreeBSD clang version 11.0.1 (git_at_github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git llvmorg-11.0.1-0-g43ff75f2c3fe) > Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd14.0 > Thread model: posix > InstalledDir: /usr/bin > Doesn't surprise me. gcc knows about freebsd special handling of the i387 on i686-*-freebsd. clang does not. clang: % cc -E -dM -c -march=i686 testf.c | egrep "(FLT_EVAL_METHOD|__ILP32|__LP64)" #define FLT_EVAL_METHOD (-1) #define __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ 2 #define __ILP32__ 1 gcc10: % gcc10 -E -dM -c -march=i686 testf.c | egrep "(FLT_EVAL_METHOD|__ILP32|__LP64)" #define __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ 2 #define __FLT_EVAL_METHOD_TS_18661_3__ 2 #define __ILP32__ 1 #define FLT_EVAL_METHOD __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ -- SteveReceived on Tue Feb 16 2021 - 00:01:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:27 UTC