hm! On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 at 08:02, qcwap <1051244836_at_qq.com> wrote: > > This patch corrects ieee80211_vht_get_vhtcap_ie for 160/80P80 channel width recognition. > > diff --git a/sys/net80211/ieee80211.h b/sys/net80211/ieee80211.h > index 86ab1459cca..76c43629b33 100644 > --- a/sys/net80211/ieee80211.h > +++ b/sys/net80211/ieee80211.h > _at__at_ -811,9 +811,9 _at__at_ struct ieee80211_ie_vht_operation { > #define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK 0x0000000C > #define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK_S 2 > #define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_NONE 0 > -#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MHZ 1 > -#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160_80P80MHZ 2 > -#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_RESERVED 3 > +#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160MHZ 4 > +#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_160_80P80MHZ 8 > +#define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_RESERVED 16 > > #define IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_IS_160MHZ(_vhtcaps) \ > (_IEEE80211_MASKSHIFT(_vhtcaps, IEEE80211_VHTCAP_SUPP_CHAN_WIDTH_MASK) >= \ This is the flag change from the draft 11ac spec to the released 11ac spec, right? I remember they needed to change the flags because existing draft implementations got the 80+80/160MHz negotiation really badly wrong in some interop places... -adrian > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Mon Mar 29 2021 - 15:27:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:27 UTC