On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 19:05, David Chisnall <theraven_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > [ Disclaimer: I work for Microsoft, but not on WSL and this is my own > opinion ] > (...) > David > Just as a counterpoint to Rozhuk's take, that all sounds sensible enough to me - FreeBSD would probably gain more from this than MS. So the WSL2 TODO would be something like this: * Ballooning driver. Seems like a proof of concept would be doable enough - could you model it as an unkillable task (userland or kernel) that wants to allocate a lot of memory, and anything it gets it hands back to the host? * Some sort of boot support. Maybe as a shim that chainloads an unmodified kernel? Probably finicky, but also self-contained. * File systems. Is / also 9p-over-HyperV-channels? If so that's kind of crucial and perhaps the hardest part. Oh, and how does the terminal work? You support multiple ttys, so I guess it's not straight emulated serial? -- DanielReceived on Sun May 09 2021 - 01:56:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:28 UTC