RELENG_5_0 v. HEAD

From: Evan Dower <evantd_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 09:42:25 -0800
I've been tracking RELENG_5_0 pretty much since it existed, but I am 
wondering now if it would be better to track -CURRENT via HEAD instead. 
After all, with the semi-frozen status of HEAD, all knew commits should be 
fairly conservative and the _general_ _ trend_ should at least be toward a 
more stable product. I wonder if HEAD is actually a more stable product than 
RELENG_5_0. Certainly it would be for anyone using the nvidia-driver, since 
it is unsupported on RELENG_5_0. What are your thoughts? Do you have any 
advice for me? I do not run a "production server" but I require that my 
computer work most of the time as a workstation.
Thanks for your opinions on the matter,
Evan Dower

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Received on Tue Apr 01 2003 - 07:42:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC