Re: ULE nice behavior fixed.

From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh_at_starjuice.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:13:00 +0200

On (2003/04/02 01:54), Jeff Roberson wrote:

> It probably still needs some tweaking but it seems to be MUCH better now.
> New algorithm entirely.
> 
> nice +20 processes will not run if anything else wants to.

Some of us have been waiting for that behaviour for a long time (long
before you started working on ULE).

Thanks very much!

Ciao,
Sheldon.

Received on Tue Apr 01 2003 - 23:13:05 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Terry Lambert: "Re: libthr and 1:1 threading."
Previous message: Stijn Hoop: "Re: libthr and 1:1 threading."
In reply to: Jeff Roberson: "ULE nice behavior fixed."
Next in thread: Bruce Evans: "Re: ULE nice behavior fixed."
Reply: Bruce Evans: "Re: ULE nice behavior fixed."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC