Re: libthr and 1:1 threading.

From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander_at_Leidinger.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 13:22:52 +0200
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 23:28:01 -0800
Terry Lambert <tlambert2_at_mindspring.com> wrote:

> The primary performance reasoning behind a 1:1 kernel threading
> implementation, relative to the user space single kernel entry
> scheduler in the libc_r implementation is SMP scalability for
> threaded applications.

I think Jeff (or someone else?) said, that some web browsers gain
"something" too (serialization issues with libc_r)? I had the impression
that this also applies to UP systems.

Do I misremember this? If not, does it not apply to UP systems as well?

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
Actually, Microsoft is sort of a mixture between the Borg and the Ferengi.

http://www.Leidinger.net                       Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net
  GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91  3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Received on Wed Apr 02 2003 - 01:23:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC