John Baldwin wrote: > On 02-Apr-2003 Peter Schultz wrote: > >>I'm sorry for beating a dead horse. A guy and I from tcbug were just >>trying to fix his postfix installation, he does not know what happened, >>it just stopped working. There would not have been a problem if >>sendmail wasn't tied into the system so closely. I'm just hoping core >>will say, "submit a working solution and it will be done," so that >>there's a little inspiration here. >> >>Pete... > > > First, core_at_ is not the appropriate body for that type of request. > Both current_at_ and arch_at_ are much better targets. Second, is > NO_SENDMAIL + the postfix port inadequate? > The problem I see with that is, that even a minimalistic base install installs things like sendmail, ppp, atm-stuff, g77 and so on. I really think splitting the base in some sub-parts would it make much easier to do NO_SENDMAIL on my own. So I had to remove each not required file separately. That's no good solution. Regards, JensReceived on Wed Apr 02 2003 - 06:01:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC