On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:36:05AM +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:41:14 +0300 > Ruslan Ermilov <ru_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > > RE> Currently it is supported, but may not be soon. The > RE> issue was brought up with Technical Review Board who > RE> are currently in the process of voting on the supported > RE> upgrade path matrix (both native and cross arch), and > RE> one possibility might be that the only supported upgrade > RE> path will be from 4-STABLE to 5.0-RELEASE, and only then > RE> to 5.0-CURRENT. > > I've a feeling that there are a fair number of folks planning > on going 4-STABLE to 5-STABLE when it happens. It would be nice if that > path were smooth. > The jump from 4.LATEST-RELEASE -> 5.FIRST-STABLE-RELEASE release will be of course supported. The question here is should we support say 4.8-STABLE -> 5.8-STABLE, that far? Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru_at_sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru_at_FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC