On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 10:32:20 +0300 Ruslan Ermilov <ru_at_freebsd.org> wrote: RE> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:36:05AM +0200, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: RE> > On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:41:14 +0300 RE> > I've a feeling that there are a fair number of folks planning RE> > on going 4-STABLE to 5-STABLE when it happens. It would be nice if RE> > that path were smooth. RE> > RE> The jump from 4.LATEST-RELEASE -> 5.FIRST-STABLE-RELEASE release RE> will be of course supported. The question here is should we That "of course" in this kind of context is one of the best things about FreeBSD. Thank you. RE> support say 4.8-STABLE -> 5.8-STABLE, that far? Oh well that's another matter, it's well known that upgrades over too wide a jump are sticky and may require staging (at which point sanity usually intervenes with migration instead). -- C:>WIN | Directable Mirrors The computer obeys and wins. |A Better Way To Focus The Sun You lose and Bill collects. | licenses available - see: | http://www.sohara.org/Received on Fri Apr 04 2003 - 22:21:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC