Re: why not document load modules instead of recompiling kernel??

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_ofug.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 20:23:39 +0200

Jun Su <csujun_at_yahoo.com> writes:
> However, kldload ipfw also works. Why there isn;t any
> words about this? Is loadable module not encourage? 

The module is built without any options (such as logging), and there
is no kld for divert sockets or dummynet.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_ofug.org

Received on Sun Apr 06 2003 - 09:23:45 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: weird fxp / timecounter interaction in top-of-tree"
Previous message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: weird fxp / timecounter interaction in top-of-tree"
In reply to: Jun Su: "why not document load modules instead of recompiling kernel??"
Next in thread: Friedemann Becker: "Re: why not document load modules instead of recompiling kernel??"
Reply: Friedemann Becker: "Re: why not document load modules instead of recompiling kernel??"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC