hi, there! On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 08:35:14AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > > Out of curiosity, how do the staticly-linked binaries in /bin and /sbin > > > handle this since they can't dlopen anything? Do users handled by > > > dynamically-loaded NSS modules just show up as UIDs with no name in > > > /bin/ls? > > > > Yep. > > The following is a work-around: > > > > cd /usr/src/bin/ls > > make clean > > make NOSHARED=NO depend > > make NOSHARED=NO > > make NOSHARED=NO install > > You might want to look at how libpam handles this situation. In the > static case, all of the known modules are linked into it statically. > Then they are located and registered at runtime by means of a linker > set. statically linking pam_ldap to /bin/ls will be a nightmare :) we need either allow dlopen(3) to be used in statically linked programs or move to dynamically linked /. /fjoeReceived on Thu Apr 17 2003 - 09:55:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:03 UTC