In article <20030418014500.B94094_at_iclub.nsu.ru>, Max Khon <fjoe_at_iclub.nsu.ru> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 08:35:14AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > > You might want to look at how libpam handles this situation. In the > > static case, all of the known modules are linked into it statically. > > Then they are located and registered at runtime by means of a linker > > set. > > statically linking pam_ldap to /bin/ls will be a nightmare :) True, but why would /bin/ls need anything from PAM at all? It doesn't currently use PAM. > we need either allow dlopen(3) to be used in statically linked programs > or move to dynamically linked /. Moving to a fully dynamically linked system sounds easier to me. But in the past there has been strong opposition to the idea every time it has been proposed. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam TrungpaReceived on Thu Apr 17 2003 - 10:44:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:03 UTC