On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 07:54:55AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 12:05:36PM +0400, Zherdev Anatoly wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:11:33 -0500 > > "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > > After install -current with this patches named can't find user bind > > > > #id bind > > uid=53(bind) gid=53(bind) groups=53(bind) > > > > #/usr/sbin/named -u bind -g bind > > user "bind" unknown > > Holy schnikeys, apparently bind doesn't use the libc getpwent(3) > functions, but rather it uses its own libirs. > > Did you re-run pwdb_mkdb ? If I messed up the backwards-compatibility > code, then I suppose it could break libirs (which apparently has > intimate knowledge of the format of /etc/pwd.db -- ugh). > > I'm investigating. Oh, duh. If named weren't re-compiled it would have been fine :-) pwd_mkdb is creating the compatibility entries correctly, but the _PW_KEYBY* symbols in pwd.h changed values and libirs uses those. For now I will see about giving _PW_KEYBY* their old values back, because I don't want to take part of bind off the vendor branch in CVS. Thanks for the report! Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar_at_celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine_at_verio.net . nectar_at_FreeBSD.org . nectar_at_kth.seReceived on Fri Apr 18 2003 - 04:19:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:04 UTC