On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > On the topic of nice for the idle process(es), shouldn't they be running > with the highest allowable value (+20)? Though this has no technical > impact, couldn't they get that nice value for aesthetic purposes? No, since they have a different scheduling policy than all normal niced processes and don't behave like nice -20 (nice = +20) processes. They sort of behave like nice -21 through nice -52 processes. top(1) has a hack which are supposed to display them as having the fake nice values 21 through 52, but it is broken in -current by much the same kernel changes that break the display of rtprio values in ps(1) (see my other reply to this thread). BruceReceived on Thu Apr 24 2003 - 03:55:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:04 UTC