On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > Looks OK, but if we are doing a dynamic allocation, it might be > > better to start at NLDT just to avoid the known problem of someone > > using 6... Just a thought. > > sure.. (though we don't know how many they use.... we just saw the first > one fail). > > of course they only link with linux threads. > when they link with us they's use our %gs.. > > I also noticed that if we disable the 'splat' mode, we'd break sysVR4 > binary code as they do that.. (though it's #if 0'd out at the moment) not to mention linux (more important..) though I might add that that code could do with rewriting to get rid of a lot of "stackgap" stuff. (i386/linux/linux_machdep.c around line 630)Received on Fri Aug 01 2003 - 15:27:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:17 UTC