Re: INET6 in world

From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 20:52:50 +0200
At 9:37 AM -0700 2003/08/05, David O'Brien wrote:

>  Machanism, not policy.  I would also like to run with NO_INET6.  IPv6
>  support has done nothing for me other than cause me problems.  I still
>  strongly disagree with our ordering of localhost in /etc/hosts.  My
>  system worked worlds better when I put the IPv4 localhost first.

	There is no IPv6 in this house, nor is there likely to be any 
time soon.  If I can't kill IPv6 from a configuration standpoint, 
I'll go ripping out the freakin' code, or I'll use an OS that gives 
me the option.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
Received on Tue Aug 05 2003 - 10:01:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:17 UTC