At 9:37 AM -0700 2003/08/05, David O'Brien wrote: > Machanism, not policy. I would also like to run with NO_INET6. IPv6 > support has done nothing for me other than cause me problems. I still > strongly disagree with our ordering of localhost in /etc/hosts. My > system worked worlds better when I put the IPv4 localhost first. There is no IPv6 in this house, nor is there likely to be any time soon. If I can't kill IPv6 from a configuration standpoint, I'll go ripping out the freakin' code, or I'll use an OS that gives me the option. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)Received on Tue Aug 05 2003 - 10:01:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:17 UTC