At 12:16 PM -0700 2003/08/05, Kevin Oberman wrote: > I may have missed part of this tread as I am on travel. Why is simply > not enabling ipv6 adequate? Note: I DO run IPv6 routinely when at > work, so I normally do have it enabled. I'd like to get an > understanding of what the issue might be. The point is clearly > strongly heald be some reasonably knowledgeable people. I'm from the school where you don't run anything you don't absolutely need. Not even if the code is not being used, just loaded. I don't mind having the code on disk and accessible if/when I need it (even though that's also a risk), but I absolutely do not want the code loaded unless I'm actually going to be making use of it. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)Received on Tue Aug 05 2003 - 13:04:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:17 UTC