Re: ntop broken?

From: Charlie Schluting <charlie_at_schluting.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 15:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Scott R. wrote:

> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 22:39, Charlie Schluting wrote:
> > 5BOn Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:57:53AM -0700, Charlie Schluting wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Howdy,
> > > > Running 5.0.
> > >
> > > cvsup to 5.1 and retry.  The package currently builds on a clean 5.1 system.
> > >
> > > Kris
> >
> > Interesting. So, I tried, and it deleted all my ports. I was using this:
> > Any ideas? Thanks a bunch :)
>
> Yes.  Your tag for ports should be '.', so:
>
> *default tag=.
>
> not
>
> *default tag=RELENG_5_1
>
> There is no such animal and that is why it deleted all of your ports
> instead of updating them.  In addition, specifying 'ports-all' is
> sufficient ('ports-base' is not needed unless you are only cvsup'ing
> individual collections).
>
> -Scott

Well, that's what I had before.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
says that RELENG_5_1 is valid.

So, if I used *default tag=. previously, that means the previous poster
was wrong? Or was he saying I needed to do the whole make buildworld
thing?

--Charlie
Received on Wed Aug 06 2003 - 13:51:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:18 UTC