In message <20030809020121.GC1741_at_wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: >> and it seems that vinum does not respect the D_NOGIANT flag which >> GEOM recently started setting. > >Probably because it didn't know about it. As I've said before, it >would be nice to be informed about the changes you're making, >particularly given your stated intention of doing no work on Vinum. I had the choice between supporting sos_at_ effort to de-Giantize ATA or wait for the non-maintainer of vinum to possibly react to his email so I chose the former as being more beneficial to the project. >Could you please give details (privately if you want, but I think this >could be of interest to other people too). See sys/fs/specfs/specfs_vnops.c, that is probably faster. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Fri Aug 08 2003 - 19:38:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:18 UTC