RE: smp in 5.1

I've been running 5.1-Current since its release on a Dell Precision 410 with
dual P-III 500's
No SMP problems here at all.. Its been extremely stable for me thus far.

Darin -

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Steve Kargl
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:10 PM
To: Andy Farkas
Cc: freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org; Eriq Lamar
Subject: Re: smp in 5.1


On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote:
> 
> > Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so 
> > could someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual 
> > system using mp's but not sure which version would be better.
> 
> Scheduling in 5.1 is broken (sched_ule doesn't even work*).
> 
> Stick with 4.8.
> 
> * for me, sched_ule completely locks up my box, no ping, no keybd. 
> Exact same kernel with sched_4bsd works fine.
> 

Strange.  ULE has worked fine on my UP system for 
several months and the SMP system I recently obtained
from a co-worker hasn't panicked while running ULE.
Can you drop into ddb and trace the problem with
ULE on your system? 

-- 
Steve
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"