RE: smp in 5.1

I guess I'll chime in as well... I have a Dual Athlon 2000+ MP here and
it's running like a charm with SCHED_4BSD.

Andy

> Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant >
> Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/    >

On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, derwood wrote:

> I've been running 5.1-Current since its release on a Dell Precision 410 with
> dual P-III 500's
> No SMP problems here at all.. Its been extremely stable for me thus far.
>
> Darin -
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Steve Kargl
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:10 PM
> To: Andy Farkas
> Cc: freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org; Eriq Lamar
> Subject: Re: smp in 5.1
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 08:25:38AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Eriq Lamar wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any advantage in 5.1 over 4.8 for two amd mp's. and if so
> > > could someone tell what they are. I am interested in building dual
> > > system using mp's but not sure which version would be better.
> >
> > Scheduling in 5.1 is broken (sched_ule doesn't even work*).
> >
> > Stick with 4.8.
> >
> > * for me, sched_ule completely locks up my box, no ping, no keybd.
> > Exact same kernel with sched_4bsd works fine.
> >
>
> Strange.  ULE has worked fine on my UP system for
> several months and the SMP system I recently obtained
> from a co-worker hasn't panicked while running ULE.
> Can you drop into ddb and trace the problem with
> ULE on your system?
>
> --
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>