On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 07:47:01PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > KAME guys have it here: > > http://orange.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/freebsd5/sys/sys/mbuf.h?rev=1.5 > > The KAME snapshot of our source tree is 3 months out of date. The most > recent version of mbuf.h is here: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/mbuf.h?rev=1.122&content-type=text/plain > > We already have 0x8000 assigned, and the only free flags value is 0x4000 -- > but it conflicts with other private usages in the kernel (as per the CVS > comments.) > > Does SCTP-KAME really need a special flag value? OK, I am looking at the FreeBSD-4 source tree for KAME and found this: http://orange.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/freebsd4/sys/sys/mbuf.h.diff?r1=1.18&r2=1.19 CVS comment: "sctp for freebsd4 - again, not ready for daily use yet" It looks like M_NOTIFICATION was added specifically for SCTP. I'll try to find out more about this. Thanks. -- Craig Rodrigues http://crodrigues.org rodrigc_at_crodrigues.orgReceived on Wed Aug 13 2003 - 15:21:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:18 UTC