It seems Daniel Eischen wrote: > > This is a case for Thomas I guess, atapicam is his baby I just allow it > > to be around :) > > I appreciate all the work you've done for ATA. But that said, atapicam > has been present for a while, and it should have been tested and made > to work -- at least so it doesn't panic the system -- before committing > ATAng. And that is axactly the case, this is what I've got from Thomas and that should have been tested etc etc.. -SørenReceived on Sun Aug 24 2003 - 06:43:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:19 UTC