On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > This is a case for Thomas I guess, atapicam is his baby I just allow it > > > to be around :) > > > > I appreciate all the work you've done for ATA. But that said, atapicam > > has been present for a while, and it should have been tested and made > > to work -- at least so it doesn't panic the system -- before committing > > ATAng. > > And that is axactly the case, this is what I've got from Thomas and that > should have been tested etc etc.. OK, I guess I missed that. Sorry for the repeated response. -- Dan EischenReceived on Sun Aug 24 2003 - 06:53:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:19 UTC