On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 01:55:49PM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: > I tried to install FreeBSD 5.1-current from 30.07. and 31.08 > on my wifes machine. Unluckily I experience problems with the > fxp driver. > > On google I found a similar report from June 3rd. > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2003-June/004739.html > > What I tried: since USB and fxp driver shared the same IRQ I > disabled USB in the BIOS and made sure, that the NIC has an > IRQ of its own, but still no success. Sounds like IRQ9 support is broken. Everything using IRQ9 (uhci0/1 and fxp0) fails in a similar way. > uhci0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 9 at device 4.2 on pci > 0 > usb0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhub0: port error, restarting port 1 > uhub0: port error, giving up port 1 > uhub0: port error, restarting port 2 > uhub0: port error, giving up port 2 > uhci1: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 9 at device 4.3 on pci > 0 > usb1: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci1 > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > uhub1: port error, restarting port 1 > uhub1: port error, giving up port 1 > uhub1: port error, restarting port 2 > uhub1: port error, giving up port 2 > fxp0: <Intel 82559 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xb000-0xb03f mem 0xed000000-0xed0ffff > f,0xed800000-0xed800fff irq 9 at device 10.0 on pci0 > fxp0: Ethernet address 00:d0:b7:bd:03:b3 > miibus0: <MII bus> on fxp0 > inphy0: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus0 > inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso_at_bwct.de info_at_bwct.deReceived on Sun Aug 31 2003 - 04:24:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:20 UTC