On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 06:44:05PM -0500, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > Okay, I'll wait without DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS until fix is committed. > > > > DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS is quite usable as long as you don't run find, tar, etc. > > that traverses procfs. > > This isn't entirely relevant, but I'd like to point out how happy I am > that it works even this much. When I started fixing up VFS we couldn't > even run init without DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS panicing. It took me a few weeks of > hacking to get the system running anything useful with all of these > assertions. A lot of other people have put significant effort in along > the way as well. I'm very happy to see the progress. If I remember it in the new year, I might try running the package builds with DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS for a while. Historically this has been a very good way to locate out-of-the-way kernel bugs. Kris "Bug Magnet" Kennaway
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:33 UTC