On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 02:41:23PM +0100, Max Laier wrote: > On Wednesday 31 December 2003 14:26, Mark Huizer wrote: > > > > Well, that's tougher, since EAI_NODATA is defined (it's defined to be > > EAI_NODATA). > > Hmm... > > would this work? I'm not too 100% secure about preprocessing stuff. > > If this should work, I could try to get it included in the normal kaffe > > tree. > > > > #if defined(EAI_NODATA) && EAI_NODATA != EAI_NONAME > > ... > > #endif > > Other question, does it hurt you that EAI_NODATA == EAI_NONAME? I'd not think > so ... so why borther?! But yes, the syntax is okay ... consider extra > parentheses for the second expression. Eg. it does matter if both macros occur in case labels of a switch statement. Regards, Stefan FarfelederReceived on Wed Dec 31 2003 - 05:18:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:36 UTC